The title of this post is misleading. Of course, it goes in this post to television advertising for athlete's foot. Such television advertising is not what the average reader and TV viewer is known. Whether the Internet there are groups in the acquisition and preservation of such a disease experience internal benefits, the author is unknown. In an interesting decision of the BGH vom 11.9.2008, Az: I ZR 58/06, it was rather the question of whether admissible in a TV advertisement, a written notice can be displayed, if not excluded that also blind spectators or those who listen only but no look, perceive the spot and be fooled by the statement noting the absence of written instructions. This is not a misleading advertising. In In assessing whether an advertisement is misleading, of all its features including the features of the communication medium to be considered. Television advertising is, as the average consumer is known in principle from image and sound. The viewer expects it so that, where appropriate, information will be displayed. The failure to request the applicant has withdrawn therefore lawful conduct of the advertiser and therefore went too far. www.anwalt-strieder.de www.telefonrechtsrat.de
0 comments:
Post a Comment